翻訳と辞書 ・ Dickinson Museum Center ・ Dickinson Narrows, Philadelphia ・ Dickinson Police Department (North Dakota) ・ Dickinson Public Schools ・ Dickinson R. Debevoise ・ Dickinson Robinson Group ・ Dickinson Rocks ・ Dickinson S. Miller ・ Dickinson Stadium ・ Dickinson State Normal School Campus District ・ Dickinson State University ・ Dickinson System ・ Dickinson Theatres ・ Dickinson Theodore Roosevelt Regional Airport ・ Dickinson Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania ・ Dickinson v Dodds ・ Dickinson v. United States ・ Dickinson v. Zurko ・ Dickinson W. Richards ・ Dickinson Wright ・ Dickinson's Bay ・ Dickinson's kestrel ・ Dickinson's Landing, Ontario ・ Dickinson's Real Deal ・ Dickinson, Alabama ・ Dickinson, Broome County, New York ・ Dickinson, California ・ Dickinson, Franklin County, New York ・ Dickinson, Minnesota ・ Dickinson, New York
|
|
Dickinson v Dodds : ウィキペディア英語版 | Dickinson v Dodds
''Dickinson v Dodds'' (1876) 2 Ch D 463 is an English contract law case, heard by the Court of Appeal, Chancery Division, that held that notification by a third party of an offer's withdrawal is effective just like a withdrawal by the person who made an offer. The significance of this case to many students of Contract Law is that a promise to keep an offer open (an option) is itself a contract which must have some consideration. ==Facts== On Wednesday 10 June 1874 Mr Dodds delivered Mr Dickinson an offer to sell some houses for £800, an offer open until 9am on Friday 12 June. On Thursday afternoon, another man called Mr Berry told Mr Dickinson that the houses had already been sold to someone called Mr Allan (who was the second defendant). Mr Dickinson found Mr Dodds in the railway carriage at 7am on Friday morning, leaving Darlington Railway Station, and gave his acceptance there. But Mr Dodds said it was too late. Mr Dickinson sued for breach of contract.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Dickinson v Dodds」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|